AI review

Cadre’s AI reviewer reads your actual model — the geometry the kernel holds, not a screenshot — and flags the things that ruin a print, grounding the measurable ones in a checkable number and proposing a concrete fix.

Manufacturability flags

The reviewer surfaces issues as clickable markers that frame the problem in the viewport:

Grounded in measured geometry

This is the property that separates Cadre from a screenshot reviewer. A flag of a measured kind — thin wall, overhang, enclosed void, non-watertight solid — must cite the kernel’s own measured value. If the measurement does not support the flag, the flag is dropped before it reaches you.

So a thin-wall flag reads “wall 0.8 mm, threshold 2.0 mm” — a number you can check against a caliper — not a vague “looks thin.” See Methodology for how to verify this yourself.

Parameter fixes

For a part you modeled in Cadre, the reviewer proposes the fix as a typed parameter change shown as old → new (for example, “wall 0.8 → 2.1 mm”). Accept it and it applies as a single reversible edit through the review inbox. For an imported mesh with no feature tree, you still get the measured flag and the number to fix by hand.

Process presets

Choose a material and process — FDM, SLA, machined, or sheet metal — and the relevant checks and thresholds apply. A thin wall for one process is fine for another; the presets keep the flags honest to how you will make the part.

Honest scope

The reviewer explains, prioritizes, and suggests. Detection and grounding are done by the kernel; the AI turns measured numbers into plain-language flags and parameter suggestions. It is not a generate-a-part-from-text tool, and it never edits your model on its own — it proposes, and you accept.